Post by account_disabled on Mar 7, 2024 4:59:39 GMT -5
Left-wing Movements (the Bolivian Movement to Socialism), Left-wing Populism (Chavismo, With Hugo Chávez Still Alive), Institutionalized Left-wing Parties (the Chilean Socialist Party and the Uruguayan Broad Front) and, Finally, Peronism, Classified as « Populist Party-machine. Levitsky and Roberts Write: “populist Machine Parties Are Established Organizations That Have Survived Years, or Even Decades, Out of Power, Even as Oppositions to Authoritarian Governments. However, These Organizations Are Tied to the Political Project of a Dominant Personality Who is Located at the Top of a Pyramidal Authority Structure.
Party Theory, Which Levitsky and Roberts Know Well, Are Either Institutional or Movements Based on Leadership. Institutionalized Parties Have Leaders, but There Are Several of Them, and None of Them Has a Single Leader Role (Examples Would UK Mobile Database Be Chilean Socialism and the Uruguayan Frente Amplio). Peronism Would Be a Rare Avis , an Institutionalized Party, With Routinized Mechanisms and Durability, but That Requires Personalist Leadership to Function. That is to Say, Levitsky and Roberts Affirm, That Peronism Functions as a Party but Has the Particularity of Operating With "Serial Leadership." a Strong Leader is Followed by Another, and Another, and Another (or Another). The Best Description of the Party-machine.
With Serial Leadership That Levitsky and Roberts Spoke of Was Given in by the Then Governor of the Province of Salta, Juan Manuel Urtubey, a Few Months Before the Election, When in an Interview With the Newspaper La Naci Ón He Said: «look, When I Have a Candidate for President, Which I Still Don't Have, He Will Start to Seem Like a Great Leader to Me; in September, It Will Seem to Me to Be the Closest to the Postulates of Peronism, and in October, When I Win the Elections, It Will Seem to Me to Be the Reincarnation of Perón. That's How We Are". The Peronist Experience is Therefore Doubly Unique.
Party Theory, Which Levitsky and Roberts Know Well, Are Either Institutional or Movements Based on Leadership. Institutionalized Parties Have Leaders, but There Are Several of Them, and None of Them Has a Single Leader Role (Examples Would UK Mobile Database Be Chilean Socialism and the Uruguayan Frente Amplio). Peronism Would Be a Rare Avis , an Institutionalized Party, With Routinized Mechanisms and Durability, but That Requires Personalist Leadership to Function. That is to Say, Levitsky and Roberts Affirm, That Peronism Functions as a Party but Has the Particularity of Operating With "Serial Leadership." a Strong Leader is Followed by Another, and Another, and Another (or Another). The Best Description of the Party-machine.
With Serial Leadership That Levitsky and Roberts Spoke of Was Given in by the Then Governor of the Province of Salta, Juan Manuel Urtubey, a Few Months Before the Election, When in an Interview With the Newspaper La Naci Ón He Said: «look, When I Have a Candidate for President, Which I Still Don't Have, He Will Start to Seem Like a Great Leader to Me; in September, It Will Seem to Me to Be the Closest to the Postulates of Peronism, and in October, When I Win the Elections, It Will Seem to Me to Be the Reincarnation of Perón. That's How We Are". The Peronist Experience is Therefore Doubly Unique.